Contesting Session Results

Every node operator whether generating outputs or judging them must stake tokens to participate. This stake acts as collateral, putting real value behind every action they take.

Once a session is complete, users have a short window to contest the result if they believe something’s off, maybe an unfair judgment or unexpected score. To prevent spam, challengers must also stake the session’s entry fee.

If a challenge is raised, the session is automatically re-evaluated. The prompts are re-run, and the outputs are subjected to a series of sanity checks ensuring the original decision holds up. If discrepancies are found or malpractice is detected, the responsible node’s stake is slashed, and the challenger is rewarded.

This system builds a layer of trust on top of decentralisation giving users the power to challenge any malpractice, while keeping node operators honest and incentivised to perform accurately.